GPON – Gigabit Passive Optical Network

Introduction and Market Overview: The Need for Fiber

The way people use the Internet today creates a great demand for very high bandwidth: More and more workers are telecommuting. Consumers watch multiple HDTV channels, often on several TVs in the same household at the same time. They upload and download multimedia files and use bandwidth-hungry peer-to-peer services. They play online games that demand high speeds and immediate reactivity. Web 2.0-based communities and hosted services such as social networking sites and wikis are pervasive, fostering interactivity, collaboration and data-sharing while generating a need for capacity. Bringing optical fiber to every home is the definitive response to such demands for greater bandwidth.

Bringing Fiber to the Home: Benefits of GPON

One way of providing fiber to the home is through a Gigabit Passive Optical Network
GPON (pronounced ‘djee-pon’).
GPON is a point-to-multipoint access mechanism. Its main characteristic is the use of passive splitters in the fiber distribution network, enabling one single feeding fiber from the provider’s central office to serve multiple homes and small businesses.
GPON has a downstream capacity of 2.488 Gb/s and an upstream capacity of 1.244 Gbp/s that is shared among users. Encryption is used to keep each user’s data secured and private from other users. Although there are other technologies that could provide fiber to the home, passive optical networks (PONs) like GPON are generally considered the strongest candidate for widespread deployments.

Why choose GPON?

When planning a fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) evolution for their access networks, service providers can choose between three generic FTTH architectures: point-to-point; active Ethernet; and passive optical networking (PON) such as GPON.

“Point-to-point” is an Ethernet FTTH architecture similar in structure to a twisted-pair cable phone network; a separate, dedicated fiber for each home exists in the service provider’s hub location. The point-to-point architecture has merits for small-scale deployments such as citynets, but is not suitable for large-scale deployments due to its poor scalability in terms of hub location space or the number of required hub locations, power consumption and feeder fibers.

An “active Ethernet” architecture is based on the same deployment model as fiber to the node (FTTN) with active street cabinets; it is therefore feasible as a complement or migration path towards FTTH for larger deployments in very high-speed digital subscriber line (VDSL)-dominated environments.

GPON is a fully optical architecture option that offers the best of all worlds. A GPON system consists of an optical line terminal (OLT) that connects several optical network terminals (ONTs) together using a passive optical distribution network (ODN). Like active Ethernet, it aggregates users in what is called the “outside plant” or OSP, which means no mess of fibers in a central office somewhere; like point-to-point, it avoids the need for active electronics in the field by employing a passive OSP device (the optical splitter). Being a passive device, the GPON splitter requires no cooling or powering and is therefore extremely stable; in fact, it virtually never fails.

How does GPON work?

GPON has been called “elegant” for its ability to share bandwidth dynamically on a single optical fiber. Like any shared medium, GPON provides burst mode transmission with statistical usage capabilities. This enables dynamic control and sharing of upstream and downstream bandwidth using committed and excess information rate (CIR and EIR) parameters. Users can be assured of receiving their committed bandwidth under peak demand conditions, and of receiving superior service when network utilization is low. While subscribers rarely require sustained rates of 100 Mb/s each, bursting beyond this to the full line rate of a PON system (about 1.25 Gb/s upstream or 2.5 Gb/s downstream in the case of GPON) is easily enabled using the right subscriber interface. This allows a GPON to be used for many years even if subscribers have a regular need to transmit beyond an engineered guaranteed limit of 100 Mb/s.

GPON was developed with the support of the FSAN (Full Service Access Network) Group and the ITU (International Telecommunication Union). These organizations bring the major stakeholders in the telecoms industry together to define common specifications, ensuring full interworking between OLTs and ONTs. The IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) has also defined a PON standard, called Ethernet PON or EPON. The EPON standard was launched earlier than GPON and has been deployed successfully. IEEE specs are however restricted to the lower optical and media access layers of networks, and full interoperability for EPON must therefore be managed in a specific case-by-case way at every implementation. Additionally, EPON runs at only 1 Gb/s, upstream as well as downstream, providing a lower bandwidth than GPON. These factors make EPON a less attractive technology choice for providers making FTTH investment decisions today.

Implementing GPON

One of US are the first GPON implementations

A mid-sized city in Sweden where about 98 percent of households enjoy high-speed broadband access. This is to a very large extent due to the activities of one company. A utility provider that, in addition to its traditional electricity offering, delivers optical connectivity to residential and business users throughout the XXXX area.

Companies deploy one GPON architectures in various local and global region. Their customers are enthusiastic: once installed, their “box” works almost effortlessly, delivering voice, video and Internet without any upkeep after the initial setup.

They have found that GPON solution delivers smooth, maintenance-free, highly reliable performance which can be run with a limited operational staff. Revenues have been considerably augmented, as the company is now able to provide triple play services to consumers throughout the city in a scalable, cost-effective way. Perhaps most importantly, Jönköping Energi feels they have a system that will easily accommodate new or evolving systems, as they become available.

Interested in learning more about GPON?

Posted in Networks, Systems | Tagged | Leave a comment

Difference between T1 voice vs PRI

Here’s a brief description of the difference between T1 voice vs PRI

PRI or Primary Rate Interface is a switched service delivered OVER a T1 connection . If someone were to say “I want to order a PRI to location X.” What is being requested is a connection to a trunk side module capable of ISDN protocol to a Telco switch delivered to location X via a DS1 rate (T1) circuit.
Now if someone were to say “I want to order a T1 to that SAME location X.” … well… That wouldn’t be enough info… A T1 from where to where? A T1 for what? By just asking for a T1, nothing is understood or implied about where or what the circuit would be used for. A T1 can be used to truck data at the rate of 1.544 Mbps from one location to another… With channel banks and appropriate DS0 level cards, a T1 can be used to truck up to 24 separate and distinct DS0 signals (analog data, analog voice, or Digital Data Service) from one location to another… A T1 can be used to connect one location to an ISP Internet Edge device to connect a customer to the World Wide Web… In other words, a T1 is a multi use pipe….

With a point to point T1 you can use it for voice and/or data depending on the equipment you have at each end. They are basically just providing the “Pipe” and it is up to you what it is used for.
The thing with T1′s and PRI’s is it all depends on what equipment is connected to it on each end.
As quoted above, a T1 is just a 24 channel circuit that can be used for multiple things. A PRI is a protocol that uses the 24th channel to control what the other 23 channels are used for.
In a nutshell – a T1 has 24 channels using 56K for data and 8K for signalling. A PRI has 24 channels and uses 23 for data and the 24th for signalling. Also you can break down the channels on a T1 for different type of service. On the PRI all 23 channels have to be the same.
The features…. or lack of…. totally depend on where the circuit is going and what it is connected to on the other end.
Keeping it on simple terms….
PRI is a different protocol to be used with voice services over the T1 line. Where as a t1 line can also be used for voice but without using the PRI protocol and probably using different equipment at the other end to get the dial tone….
Of course….there are a lot more technical details dealing with ISDN lines (PRI’s/BRI’s) but you’ve got the basic idea.
The simplest approach to finding the best solution is to request infrastructure design and rate quotes for PRI and/or T1 voice service…. comparing providers available in your area….using the free consultative support of: FreedomFire Communications. Getting expert consultation in this manner will save you time, effort, frustration….and money.

Posted in Systems | Leave a comment

How to Photograph the MooN

All LUNAR photography fans – Here is the deal. Lets role up some riffraff for the moon – follow me below.

The moon has always been a scene that attracts many amateurs and professional photographers. It’s without question the brightest spot in the night sky and maybe due to the lunar mystic or simply due to its beauty a magnet for cameras.

But photographing the moon is not as linear as it seems. The moon is very bright (more than you probably think) and getting the right exposure that avoids the flat look can be tricky.

Gear
Tripod – Although it’s a quick exposure, you’ll get the best results setting your camera on a tripod. Remember that you want detail and any kind of motion blurring can ruin the shot.

Telephoto lens – Ah, how nice and big the moon looks… So why does it come out so small in a photo? It’s like that… For a good moon shot you’ll need a telephoto lens. You don’t need an expensive one (I used the cheap but so far good Sigma 75-300 f4-5.6) but for good detail a minimum of 300mm is recommended. I am personally using a ROKINON 800mm with a 2x converter which gives me roughly a 1600mm of magnification.

Shutter Release cable – Not really needed but recommended. The pressure of your fingers on the shutter button will increase the motion blur. To avoid this you can get a shutter release cable or do like I did (I didn’t had my cable with me) and use the shutter delay feature of your camera (I’m sure it has one). A 2 sec delay is more than enough to get your hands of the camera.

Get busy with that photo
One of the most common mistakes photographers make when first attempting to get lunar shots is underestimating the brightness of the moon. The first shots will almost undoubtedly come out overexposed with an ugly bright circle where the moon should have been.

Many photographers claim that since the moon is directly illuminated by the sun, setting your camera for a “daylight photo” can be a solution. Some also recommend following the sunny 16 rule (f/16 at 1/ISO) or the loony 11 rule (f/11 at 1/ISO). If you take a look at the photo above and the settings I used, none of these actually applied but probably due to the fact that the Earth’s atmosphere absorbs a huge amount of the light and this value varies according to the angle of the moon above the horizon. Using a “fixed” value does not work and you should experiment to find the best results. I tried the following the loony 11 but gave an overexposed moon with some detail loss in the brightest areas.

Start with the following settings:

Aperture at f/11
ISO 100 (you don’t want any noise on your photo and it’s so bright there is really no need to go above 100)
1/125 – 1/250

Now set your autofocus to point, aim at the moon, focus and turn the autofocus off. Don’t touch that ring anymore.

For good measure bracket your EV 1 or 2 units (if your camera allows you can get a few sequential shots with different EV values).

And that is it. Moon photos galore.

And more
Now that you have your moon, it’s time to work on it in silico.

The photo above was only cropped. No other processing. So, you can see that is possible to get average moon photos just out of your camera. If you want to make it even better, try playing a bit with the curves on Photoshop. You’ll probably manage to give more texture to your photo by increasing the contrast between midtones and highlights. Somehow I liked the result as it is (albeit flat) and decided not to touch it anymore.

If you want a more natural texture with more shadows, giving the lunar landscape a more tri-dimensional feeling, try shooting the different moon phases and not only full moon. The different angles at which the sun illuminates the lunar surface can create astonishing effects.

Now, this photo was taken back in the end of April, but for what I can see, today is full moon or very close to it. So, why not go outside and be creative? Let’s hope there are no clouds wherever you are.

Got any more tips for good lunar photography? Share them with us

Posted in Photography | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

FreE AppLications to Clone Your preCious hoMe PC Hard DrivE

Hard drive prices are so low now that it really makes sense to use an imaging program. That way you’ve got a perfectly cloned backup of your system exactly the way you have it configured in case of a crash, which is much more convenient than reinstalling Windows, activating, and loading all your applications all over again.

Here are four great apps to get the job done – without spending a penny!

DriveImage XML. Runtime Software has never placed too much importance on looks, and it’s for a very good reason. Their software works really, really well. DriveImage was the first software I used to create images within Windows. Scheduled backups can be created with the Windows Task Scheduler and command line switches. DriveImage is free for private, home use only. Yes, Macrium Reflect does the same thing and looks nicer, but it’s $39.99.

At one point Macrium’s site made it very difficult to find the free link anymore…it’s back, and available for download here – and I highly recommend it!

For a straight-up, drive-to-drive clone, you can use Runtime’s Shadow Copy. Shadow copy is free for everyone, not just home users.

Like DriveImage, XXClone runs in Windows. It has an extremely simple interface, and gives you the option to copy volume ID to your destination and make it bootable. The interface also provides quick access to the Windows disk manager, in case you need to perform some quick drive tasks prior to cloning. XXClone is free for personal, private use.

Those who, like me, prefer imaging from the command prompt should try EaseUs Disk Copy. It’s interface looks a bit like a Ghost/Partition Magic mashup. It’s very easy to use, handles all types of internal and external drives, and will even work with dynamic disks. DiskCopy is free for everyone.

Linux buffs will urge you to try PING, which I mention in 5 Apps for a Painless Reformat. Ping can clone drives, create bootable recovery media, back up BIOS data, reset passwords, and clean your cat’s litter box. Ok, not really, but it’s got more tricks up its sleeve than any other free cloning solution.

Did I miss your imaging app of choice? Comment it!

Posted in OS/Hardware | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

My Picture collection

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Nikon D300 Time Lapse Photography

I’ve been experimenting with some of the features of my Nikon D300. I shot this time lapse sequence and uploaded. It looks great on a pc, the capture being much higher definition than HD, but it has never uploaded to YouTube and the online result is very degraded.

I read the manual before starting this time lapse up, but I have never done it before.

Some observations:

1. You can’t shoot time lapse with the mirror up on the D300. This is a shame because my camera made a lot of noise while shooting drawing a lot of attention. I had a small crowd hanging over my shoulder asking me questions.

2. The camera is not designed to take time lapse sequences at this frame rate and duration. It can take bursts of up to nine pictures up to 999 sequences. To get this sequence I set the time between sequences short enough that it had to stay in burst mode at about 3 frames per second. A few of these sessions and I’d need a new camera!

3. I should have focused on the subject once with a deep depth of field and then turned off auto focus. I just let the camera focus between shots and this sometimes caused a movement in the frame.

4. The camera would be better in manual, but I had it in aperture priority. Sometimes the scene seems to flicker and I think this is why. Next time (not that there’ll be one) You need to set a manual exposure just slightly high, so that over an hour of shooting in the afternoon the light would fall into ideal exposure.

5. Forget trying to post-process the results other than compositing the video. This was 5,800 individual shots!

Posted in Photography | Tagged , | Leave a comment

REVIEW- Need For Speed: THE RUN

For years, Need For Speed was the games industry’s equivalent of Justin Bieber – insanely popular despite lacking any discernible merit beyond an obscenely huge marketing budget.Its been a while the core team have been struggling…to be in the ULTIMATE rank….so here it is…check below.

Buy it from PS3 Wii PC XBox 360 Need for Speed: The Run Electronic Arts Then Electronic Arts finally entrusted the franchise to its best in-house arcade racing game developer, the legendary, Guildford-based Criterion, of Burnout fame. The result was last year’s NFS: Hot Pursuit, perhaps the best arcade-racer ever.
This year, the responsibility for creating EA’s four wheel-based cash-cow has reverted to Canadian developer Black Box, creator of several old (and mediocre) NFS games. This time around, though, it has an unprecedented arsenal with which to elevate its efforts.

For starters, the game has been built on the mighty Frostbite 2 engine, which powers Battlefield 3. And Black Box has been able to avail itself of Criterion’s brilliant Autolog, which lets you race against your friends offline and constantly generates new challenges.The first thing you notice is the effect of Frostbite 2. Need For Speed: The Run looks absolutely stupendous – graphically, it’s possibly the best-looking racing game ever, with incredibly lifelike landscapes stretching into the distance and gloriously crisp cars and cut-scenes.

Encouragingly, Black Box has also sorted a problem that afflicted its earlier NFS games. The cars in The Run handle like they should – that is, fast, responsive and tail-happy, ever-keen to drift around corners.
The single-player game’s premise is good, too. You play Jack Rourke, a monosyllabic cipher entered into a Cannonball Run-style race from San Francisco to New York, with a $25m prize awaiting the winner.

Jack’s odyssey is split into nine legs, each itself split into stages. You’re allowed five “resets” on each stage, which are triggered when you crash out or are busted by the police – or you can trigger them yourself, essentially committing suicide if you feel you’re not going to be able to meet that stage’s objective without rewinding to the last checkpoint.
It’s never good having to reset yourself in a game, and Need For Speed: The Run soon adds a whole host of instances of poor game design.

You can, for example, change cars (which is essential if the road surface changes, as it does) by driving into petrol stations by the side of the road. But you’re penalised so heavily for doing so – to the extent that it can make the difference between hitting or missing your objective – that you swiftly become reluctant to do so. And rather than remembering what car you’d rather be driving, it resets you to your rejected motor if you miss your objective.

Posted in Games | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Blogging Tips and Tricks about Blogging

You probably started blogging because you wanted to create more time for yourself, and end the rat race. But now you seem to be using every available minute thinking and planning your next move.
So how do you free yourself up? Well… by putting systems in place. Basically batching and automating as much as you can. It’s one of the most effective ways to tackle any large project has always been to divide and conquer. If you look at any manufacturing plant… you’ll see robots and workers who only focus on one task at a time. Use this thinking when blogging to save yourself valuable time.

You don’t know what to blog about, you are running out of ideas. What do you do? First create a Google Docs spreadsheet so that you can keep track of your topics and keywords that you are looking to blog about. Then visit sites like forums, Yahoo Answers and LinkedIn Answers to see what questions people are asking in your particular blogging niche. With your new Google Docs try to shoot for 15 new blogging topics, you’ll quickly be able to find what are the most pressing issues. Once you have your topics, run over to the Google Keyword Tool and start brainstorming for keyword ideas… and then jotting them down on the same Google Docs spreadsheet. By batching all of this together, you are literally saving yourself hours. You also don’t have to wait for inspiration to hit. Whenever you need a new topic to blog about, just head over to your Google Doc and pick one of your topics. You’ll know that you already have a good blogging topic, because it’s a topic or question that many people need clarification on.

Tweeting Your Posts – The Half-Life of a tweet is not long at all. I’ve seen reports that say that the relevancy of a tweet is a few hours long to just a few minutes. Whatever the case is… a link on twitter doesn’t live very long. But you can test which time a day is the most effective time to tweet for your blog’s audience. Meaning if you tweet your blog post, are your readers going to be around to see it. Let’s automate your tweets… You can use a free service like Timely to maximize your tweets potential. Timely looks at your past 199 tweets and figures out the most effective time to publish your tweets. They put emphasis on the time of day that your followers are actually active, the time of day that they’ve actually interacted with you… via RT’s and conversations. With Timely you can load up your post and they’ll take care of the rest. You’ll still want to actually interact with your followers, since social media is about being social… but at least your post tweets will always be maximized for impact.

Photos can have a massive impact on your blog post… both positive and negative. Before you add your next image to a blog post take a look at this post from SocialTriggers How Images Improve—or Destroy—Conversion Rates
So how do we find impactful photos to use? You can really waste hours trying to find the right photos, especially photos that you can legally use and are free from copyright restrictions. The best way to go about this is search sites like morgueFile or stock.xchng. These are two excellent resources for royalty free photos… but what about Flickr? Well Flickr has a massive collection of photos, and you’ll be able to find some excellent photos that are completely free to use. You’ll just have to ad an advance search and look for photos that have a Creative Commons license.
You’ll just have to use the photo giving the photographer credit… or in technical terms “attribution”. Since this post is about automation, you can just install the WordPress plugin Photo Dropper. Photo Dropper makes it incredibly easy to search the Flickr Creative Commons photo database. Then with a click you’ll add that photo to your post… including the necessary attribution information. How easy is that? Oh, and it’s also a free plugin.

Conclusion
We all know that we can save time, by batching like task together. However, sometimes it’s just hard to take a break… and actually take a step back to see the entire picture.Start right now… head over to Google Docs and create your document… then link your twitter account to Timely and install Photo Dropper. So, I really hope that this post has given you some ideas on how you can save time with your blog. Let me know if you have other time saving blogging ideas… I’m really interested to see what creative ideas you all have. Also… feel free to share this post on Twitter and Facebook.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Dell Studio 1747 Touch screen Notebook Review

CORE Components details.

:: Processor -Intel Core i7 720QM 1.6 ~ 2.9 GHz
:: Mainboard-Intel PM55
:: Memory-4096 MB, DDR3-1333 MHz
:: Graphics adapter-ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 – 1024 MB
:: Display-17.3 inch 16:9, 1600×900 pixel, glossy and TOUCH SCREEN.
:: Harddisk-Seagate ST9500420ASG ATA, 500GB 7200rpm
:: Soundcard-IDT 92HD73C1 / 92HDW74C1 / 92HDW74C2 @ Intel Ibex Peak PCH – High Definition Audi Controller
:: Connections-1 Express Card 34mm, 2 USB 2.0, 1 Firewire, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 eSata, Audio Connections: 2x 3.5mm headphone-outs, 1x microphone-in, Card Reader: 8-in-1 cardreader: SD/MMC/xD/SDHD/SDHC/MS/MS PRO/SDIO,
:: Networking-Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Dell Wireless 1397 WLAN Mini-Card ()
:: Optical drive – HL-DT-ST DVD+-RW GA11N
:: Size height x width x depth (in mm): 39 x 414 x 281
:: Weight 3.38 kg Power Supply: 0.49 kg
:: Battery 56 Wh Lithium-Ion, 6 cell battery pack
:: Price 1247 Euro
:: Operating System Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit
:: Additional features – Webcam: 2,0 Megapixel, Power DVD DX, Roxio Burn, McAfee Security Center

Notebook specifications for Dell Studio 1747

Dell has furnished its middle class between low-priced Inspiron notebooks and fast XPS notebooks with the Studio range. The notebooks are supposed to talk multimedia users into buying a Dell laptop available in 15.4 and 17.3 inches. The entry into Dell’s Studio 17′s world starts at a list price of 688 euro and with a Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Radeon 4570. If you choose the fastest alternative, the most expensive warranty package and all software options, the price for the configuration with an Intel Core i7 820QM, Radeon 4650, an 8 GByte RAM, a hard disk memory of one terabyte and a FullHD display goes up to 3788 euro. Without shipping and supplies.

Our configuration was available for a list price of 1287 euro. An Intel Core i7 720QM processor with 1.6 – 2.9 GHz and four computing cores, a Radeon 4650 graphic card with a 1 GByte dedicated memory, a 4 GByte RAM and a 500 GByte hard disk memory was included in our prototype.One of the best Touch screen options from DELL.

Performance
If you choose the new Dell Studio 17 in our configuration alternative, you’ll probably be focusing on the Core i7 processor. The 720QM is a quad-core processor with a 1.6 to 2.8 GHz clock rate and a 6 MByte L3 cache. The processor chooses if one core with a higher rate or several cores with a lower rate is better for the performance depending on the application and adapts the number of active cores and their clock rate optimally. This automatic is of course also used for energy saving in a laptop processor.
Dell builds in a Radeon HD 4650 from ATI with a 1024 MByte dedicated graphic memory. This middle class graphic card should be enough for current games when the display’s native resolution is set to a medium detail level.
Dell heralds itself to have built-in the “fastest processor on earth”. Naturally, that isn’t quite the truth because apart from the strongest Core i7 alternative, which Dell doesn’t offer, there are still high performance computers.
But, of course, the Core i7 720QM provides overwhelming performance rates and is one of the fastest processors that is currently built into consumer notebooks. 5030 points in PCMark Vantage and 9626 points in multi-core rendering of Cinebench R10 add up to a rate of a respectable 91% in application performance. Thus, even demanding tasks, such as professional image editing and video cutting should be possible on Dell’s Studio 1747.
There are user reports in the forum on Hardwareluxx’s site that the Core i7 in their Dell Studio 1747 clocks down to 1.3 GHz under greater load. We wanted details and put the notebook to a stress test: 12 hours Furmark and the processor benchmark, Prime95, to push the graphic card and the processor to their absolute limits.
Although the tool, Speedfan, didn’t indicate a clock rate reduction after 12 hours, the immediately following 3DMark06 showed that the Dell Studio 1747′s performance capability does decrease strongly. A total of 5045 points are over 2000 less than in the test in normal conditions. The CPU performance rate is almost halved with 1745 points.
This is probably due to the undersized adapter that can’t supply all components under full load anymore. That’s why Dell sends a 130 watt adapter for free upon telephone request, with which the problem should be solved. The latest inquiry by Dell disclosed that it’s recommended to wait for the bios update A04, which should be released on January 13th and according to Dell, remedies the problem.

Gaming Performance

We first used the synthetic benchmarks of the 3DMark range for assessing the gaming performance. The oldest benchmark, 3DMark2001, of course ran through our system in no time at all, finished with a rate of 28828 points and places itself on the top of the middle field. The notebook also reveals very good rates of 13302 respectively 7149 in the more mainstream benchmarks, like 3DMark05 or 3DMark06.
Then the Studio 1747 is ushered to the world of real games where it has to show its capabilities. We tested with the cutting-edge “Modern Warfare 2″ and the equally still young “Risen”. The quite demanding in high details “Anno 1404″ and the older games “Race Driver: GRID” and “Call of Duty 4″ join in.
As expected, the notebook didn’t have any problems in very low resolutions, even with the latest games: We achieved an average of 134 frames even with “Modern Warfare 2″. When the resolution is turned up a bit to medium details, a still well-playable 41 frames are still left. A further increase of details only results in a small reduction of the average frame rate to 35 frames.
Older games like “Racedriver GRID” or “Call of Duty 4” even stay playable in the highest details with 52 respectively 45 frames. The graphic card finds its limits in “Anno 1404″ in very high details and a resolution of 1280×1024 and in “Risen” in very high details and 1366×768. 27 or 21 frames on average are still playable but aren’t really any fun anymore.
The Studio 1747 is quite impressive corresponding to its claim as a middle class gamer. Especially “Modern Warfare 2″ benefits evidently from the Core i7′s four computing cores. The frame rate of the other games is also slightly higher than in notebooks with a Core 2 Duo processor, even if the differences are significantly less there. You can play in the native resolution of 1600×900 pixels but then you have to reduce the details eminently.
In particular, the graphic card inhibits gaming. An ATI Radeon 4830 or a Geforce GTS 260M would have been the better choice. But the Dell Studio 1747 in this configuration bids significantly more gaming power in this configuration than many other multimedia notebooks anyway. We award that with a rating of 88% for gaming performance.

Battery Life
Our prototype has been equipped with a 6 cell battery from Simplo. It has a capacity of 57.7 watt hours. A 9 cell battery can also be ordered for the Studio 1747 for a surcharge of almost 70 euro and can increase, purely statistical, the battery life by up to 48 percent with its 85 watt hours.

Because our prototype only had the weaker but also a bit lighter battery, the Studio 1747 achieved mixed results in our runtime tests: the battery lasted a maximum of 3 hours and 45 minutes, which are 225 minutes. But, you have to enable all energy savings options and mustn’t load the computer in any way.

The notebook only reaches 62 minutes of runtime in other extreme, so under full load. Our results for surfing via WLAN and watching DVD are placed between these: 2 hours and 44 minutes for wireless surfing on the internet, and the battery lasts for 22 minutes less at DVD watching.

Basically, the battery runtimes aren’t overwhelming but you can live with them. An average movie can be seen easily with this battery, and because of its fairly high weight and the large screen, the Studio 1747 isn’t primarily conceived as a mobile notebook anyway.

Battery runtime Idle (without WLAN, min brightness) 3h 45min
Surfing with WLAN 2h 44min DVD 2h 22min Load (maximum brightness) 1h 02min

Appropriate for its components, the Dell Studio 1747 proves to be demanding but not prodigal: 18.7 watts have to flow out of the mains, in any case. In idle mode it’s a maximum of 24.2 watts. It can even get up to 78.5 watts under load; the flat and broad adapter can make almost 90 watt available. As already noted, the Dell Studio 1747 seems to put a high demand on the adapter.
0.1 watts still run through the notebook in a deactivated state but this could also be caused by the LED integrated in the adapter’s plug and shows that its connected to the mains. If you switch the computer into standby mode, you should note that 0.5 watts are still drained from the mains.

Verdict
Dell’s Studio 1747 spoils its chance of a very good rating due to one or two severe faults. The only average display with its tight vertical viewing angles and the not very homogenous illumination but especially the unreasonably high operating temperatures under load put a big dent into the otherwise very impressive test ratings. Also, the Studio 1747 seems to still have a few teething problems, such as the problem reported by users that the notebook doesn’t wake up from standby. But there are already solutions for that in the internet. It’s embarrassing for Dell anyway.

You could almost forget the Studio 1747′s qualities because of that. We liked the very good workmanship with exceptional materials, the plain but high-end design and the excellent loudspeakers just as much as the solid keyboard and the variety of connections that has really turned out complete starting with Firewire over an ExpressCard slot up to a display port.

The battery life turns out reasonable despite the efficient processor and of course, it’s great that you can configure your Dell as you please even if a few of the surcharge positions are disproportionally expensive. But Dell always again has discount offers. By the way, we couldn’t configure an exact alignment of our prototype on Dell’s homepage in the test period, but a similar configuration with extended service and a 9 cell battery cost a rather low 928 euro.

If you can live with the fact that your Dell heats up quite a bit after longer use and you won’t be carrying the fairly heavy notebook around too often, you can readily add a few percentage points to the rating. Principally, Dell has made an efficient multimedia book with an elegant design and numerous qualities.

Posted in Systems | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

All about Wireless Standards.

Home and business networkers looking to buy wireless local area network (WLAN) gear face an array of choices. Many products conform to the 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, or 802.11n wireless standards collectively known as Wi-Fi technologies. Additionally, Bluetooth and various other non Wi-Fi technologies also exist, each also designed for specific networking applications.
This article describes the Wi-Fi and related technologies, comparing and contrasting them to help you make educated network building decisions.
802.11
In 1997, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) created the first WLAN standard. They called it 802.11 after the name of the group formed to oversee its development. Unfortunately, 802.11 only supported a maximum network bandwidth of 2 Mbps – too slow for most applications. For this reason, ordinary 802.11 wireless products are no longer manufactured.
802.11b
IEEE expanded on the original 802.11 standard in July 1999, creating the 802.11b specification. 802.11b supports bandwidth up to 11 Mbps, comparable to traditional Ethernet.
802.11b uses the same unregulated radio signaling frequency (2.4 GHz) as the original 802.11 standard. Vendors often prefer using these frequencies to lower their production costs. Being unregulated, 802.11b gear can incur interference from microwave ovens, cordless phones, and other appliances using the same 2.4 GHz range. However, by installing 802.11b gear a reasonable distance from other appliances, interference can easily be avoided.
• Pros of 802.11b – lowest cost; signal range is good and not easily obstructed
• Cons of 802.11b – slowest maximum speed; home appliances may interfere on the unregulated frequency band
802.11a
While 802.11b was in development, IEEE created a second extension to the original 802.11 standard called 802.11a. Because 802.11b gained in popularity much faster than did 802.11a, some folks believe that 802.11a was created after 802.11b. In fact, 802.11a was created at the same time. Due to its higher cost, 802.11a is usually found on business networks whereas 802.11b better serves the home market.
802.11a supports bandwidth up to 54 Mbps and signals in a regulated frequency spectrum around 5 GHz. This higher frequency compared to 802.11b shortens the range of 802.11a networks. The higher frequency also means 802.11a signals have more difficulty penetrating walls and other obstructions.
Because 802.11a and 802.11b utilize different frequencies, the two technologies are incompatible with each other. Some vendors offer hybrid 802.11a/b network gear, but these products merely implement the two standards side by side (each connected devices must use one or the other).
• Pros of 802.11a – fast maximum speed; regulated frequencies prevent signal interference from other devices
• Cons of 802.11a – highest cost; shorter range signal that is more easily obstructed
802.11g
In 2002 and 2003, WLAN products supporting a newer standard called 802.11g emerged on the market. 802.11g attempts to combine the best of both 802.11a and 802.11b. 802.11g supports bandwidth up to 54 Mbps, and it uses the 2.4 Ghz frequency for greater range. 802.11g is backwards compatible with 802.11b, meaning that 802.11g access points will work with 802.11b wireless network adapters and vice versa.
• Pros of 802.11g – fast maximum speed; signal range is good and not easily obstructed
• Cons of 802.11g – costs more than 802.11b; appliances may interfere on the unregulated signal frequency
802.11n
The newest IEEE standard in the Wi-Fi category is 802.11n. It was designed to improve on 802.11g in the amount of bandwidth supported by utilizing multiple wireless signals and antennas (called MIMO technology) instead of one.
When this standard is finalized, 802.11n connections should support data rates of over 100 Mbps. 802.11n also offers somewhat better range over earlier Wi-Fi standards due to its increased signal intensity. 802.11n equipment will be backward compatible with 802.11g gear.
• Pros of 802.11n – fastest maximum speed and best signal range; more resistant to signal interference from outside sources
• Cons of 802.11n – standard is not yet finalized; costs more than 802.11g; the use of multiple signals may greatly interfere with nearby 802.11b/g based networks.
What About Bluetooth and the Rest?
Aside from these four general-purpose Wi-Fi standards, several other related wireless network technologies exist.
• Other IEEE 802.11 working group standards like 802.11h and 802.11j are extensions or offshoots of Wi-Fi technology that each serve a very specific purpose.
• Bluetooth is an alternative wireless network technology that followed a different development path than the 802.11 family. Bluetooth supports a very short range (approximately 10 meters) and relatively low bandwidth (1-3 Mbps in practice) designed for low-power network devices like handhelds. The low manufacturing cost of Bluetooth hardware also appeals to industry vendors. You can readily find Bluetooth in the networking of PDAs or cell phones with PCs, but it is rarely used for general-purpose WLAN networking due to the range and speed considerations.
• WiMax also was developed separately from Wi-Fi. WiMax is designed for long-range networking (spanning miles or kilometers) as opposed to local area wireless networking.

The following IEEE 802.11 standards exist or are in development to support the creation of technologies for wireless local area networking:
• 802.11a – 54 Mbps standard, 5 GHz signaling (ratified 1999)
• 802.11b – 11 Mbps standard, 2.4 GHz signaling (1999)
• 802.11c – operation of bridge connections (moved to 802.1D)
• 802.11d – worldwide compliance with regulations for use of wireless signal spectrum (2001)
• 802.11e – Quality of Service (QoS) support (not yet ratified)
• 802.11F – Inter-Access Point Protocol recommendation for communication between access points to support roaming clients (2003)
• 802.11g – 54 Mbps standard, 2.4 GHz signaling (2003)
• 802.11h – enhanced version of 802.11a to support European regulatory requirements (2003)
• 802.11i – security improvements for the 802.11 family (2004)
• 802.11j – enhancements to 5 GHz signaling to support Japan regulatory requirements (2004)
• 802.11k – WLAN system management (in progress)
• 802.11l – skipped to avoid confusion with 802.11i
• 802.11m – maintenance of 802.11 family documentation
• 802.11n – 100+ Mbps standard improvements over 802.11g (in progress)
• 802.11o – skipped
• 802.11p – Wireless Access for the Vehicular

Do You Need 802.11n Speed or Any Other Benefits of Wireless-N?

New Wi-Fi enabled gadgets support 802.11n (sometimes called Wireless-N) technology. 802.11n provides higher network bandwidth compared to other forms of wireless networking. And compared to older forms of Wi-fi, 802.11n also offers better signal range in some situations.
For years now, many households have enjoyed networks set up with older 802.11g/b Wi-Fi gear. Some even use aircards and 3G/4G wireless connections to cellular networks for their Internet access. Both of these options may run slower or less reliably than 802.11n. Do you feel compelled to upgrade your router or other wireless equipment to Wireless-N?
Explain Why or Why Not
Simple math, isn’t it?
Easy answer. If the speed your ISP gives you is higher than 54 mbps (unlikely), upgrade to Wireless-n. I have a Wireless n router on the third floor of my house, and I still get bad signal on the first floor. And it says I’m connected at 26mbps while typing this on my laptop on first floor.
—Guest reasonably educated
Consider video streams, gaming, surfing
Really depends on what you want. If you have a high quality video on one computer (server perhaps) and play on another computer (Home Theater PC?) 802.11g will sometimes hiccup in my experience, not with N. If you play games through wireless you will get a lower ping (less delay.) I can even tell the difference when surfing the net, but the difference is instead of taking half a second to load a page it takes maybe .3 seconds. Internet bandwidth is limited to at your internet connection, so big downloads are the same with both. Because of the difference in latency, or ping, your half hour download on G might take 29.5 minutes on N. So if you need that extra 0.1 second to make a headshot on an internet game, absolutely hate waiting 0.1 extra second for a page to load, you want N. If you stream high quality videos and hate the very occasional hiccup you want N. Personally I only upgraded because my old router died. Was it worth the extra bucks? Maybe, and its ready for future

Question: How Can I Get 300 Mbps Speed on My 802.11n Network?

802.11n networks support approximately 300 Mbps of rated (theoretical) bandwidth under the best conditions. Unfortunately, an 802.11n network will sometimes operate at much lower speeds (130 Mbps and below).
Answer: For an 802.11n network to run at its maximum speed, Wireless N routers and network adapters must be linked and running in a channel bonding mode.
802.11n and Channel Bonding
In 802.11n, bonding utilizes two adjacent Wi-Fi channels simultaneously to double the bandwidth of the wireless link compared to 802.11b/g. The 802.11n standard specifies 300 Mbps theoretical bandwidth is available when using channel bonding. Without it, about 50% of this bandwidth is lost (actually slightly more due to protocol overhead considerations), and 802.11n equipment will generally report connections in the 130-150 Mbps rated range in those cases.
Channel bonding substantially increases the risk of interfering with nearby Wi-Fi networks due to the increased spectrum and power it consumes.
Setting Up 802.11n Channel Bonding
802.11n products normally do not enable this mode by default but instead run in traditional single channel mode to keep the risk of interference low. Both the Wireless N router and network adapters must be configured to run in a channel bonding mode together to achieve any performance benefit.
The steps to configure channel bonding vary depending on the product. Software will sometimes refer to single channel mode as 20 MHz operation (20 MHz being the width of a Wi-Fi channel) and channel bonding mode as 40 MHz operation.
Limitations of 802.11n Channel Bonding

802.11n equipment can ultimately fail to run in the maximum (300 Mbps) performance range for these reasons:
• Some 802.11n gear cannot support channel bonding. For example, this mode of wireless signaling is government regulated in certain countries, such as the UK.
• If the 802.11n network includes any 802.11b/g clients, performance of the entire network may be negatively affected, depending on the router’s capabilities. Because 802.11b/g clients do not support channel bonding, these must be set up properly with a mixed mode Wireless N router to minimize performance impact.
• Interference from other 802.11n networks nearby can prevent a Wireless N router from sustaining channel bonded connections. In fact, some Wireless N routers automatically fall back to single channel operation when they detect wireless interference on the channels.
As with other networking standards, applications running on an 802.11n network will typically see substantially less actual bandwidth than the rated maximums imply even with channel bonding in place. A 300 Mbps rated 802.11n connection will often yield 200 Mbps or less of user data throughput.

What is MIMO

Definition: MIMO is a method of utilizing multiple radio antennas for wireless network communications. Some newer Wi-Fi routers utilize MIMO technology, enhancing their performance compared to single-antenna routers.
MIMO-based Wi-Fi routers utilize the same network protocols and signal ranges that non-MIMO routers do. The MIMO products achieve higher performance by more aggressively transmitting and receiving data over Wi-Fi channels. MIMO signaling technology can increase network bandwidth, range and reliability at the potential cost of interfering with other wireless equipment.
The specific number of antennas utilized in a MIMO Wi-Fi router can vary. Typical MIMO routers contain three or four antennas instead of the single antenna that is standard in all earlier forms of consumer Wi-Fi routers.
MIMO is a key element of the 802.11n Wi-Fi networking standard.
Also Known As: Multiple-Input Multiple-Output

How Can I Get 300 Mbps Speed on My 802.11n Network?

802.11n networks support approximately 300 Mbps of rated (theoretical) bandwidth under the best conditions. Unfortunately, an 802.11n network will sometimes operate at much lower speeds (130 Mbps and below).
Answer: For an 802.11n network to run at its maximum speed, Wireless N routers and network adapters must be linked and running in a channel bonding mode.
802.11n and Channel Bonding
In 802.11n, bonding utilizes two adjacent Wi-Fi channels simultaneously to double the bandwidth of the wireless link compared to 802.11b/g. The 802.11n standard specifies 300 Mbps theoretical bandwidth is available when using channel bonding. Without it, about 50% of this bandwidth is lost (actually slightly more due to protocol overhead considerations), and 802.11n equipment will generally report connections in the 130-150 Mbps rated range in those cases.
Channel bonding substantially increases the risk of interfering with nearby Wi-Fi networks due to the increased spectrum and power it consumes.
Setting Up 802.11n Channel Bonding
802.11n products normally do not enable this mode by default but instead run in traditional single channel mode to keep the risk of interference low. Both the Wireless N router and network adapters must be configured to run in a channel bonding mode together to achieve any performance benefit.
The steps to configure channel bonding vary depending on the product. Software will sometimes refer to single channel mode as 20 MHz operation (20 MHz being the width of a Wi-Fi channel) and channel bonding mode as 40 MHz operation.
Limitations of 802.11n Channel Bonding
802.11n equipment can ultimately fail to run in the maximum (300 Mbps) performance range for these reasons:
• Some 802.11n gear cannot support channel bonding. For example, this mode of wireless signaling is government regulated in certain countries, such as the UK.
• If the 802.11n network includes any 802.11b/g clients, performance of the entire network may be negatively affected, depending on the router’s capabilities. Because 802.11b/g clients do not support channel bonding, these must be set up properly with a mixed mode Wireless N router to minimize performance impact.
• Interference from other 802.11n networks nearby can prevent a Wireless N router from sustaining channel bonded connections. In fact, some Wireless N routers automatically fall back to single channel operation when they detect wireless interference on the channels.
As with other networking standards, applications running on an 802.11n network will typically see substantially less actual bandwidth than the rated maximums imply even with channel bonding in place. A 300 Mbps rated 802.11n connection will often yield 200 Mbps or less of user data throughput.

Posted in OS/Hardware, Systems | Tagged , , | Leave a comment